Greatness
May 10th, 2010This country was not made great by its leaders or its government, but by its people. We can be great again, but we the people have to take our country back from our “leaders”.
This country was not made great by its leaders or its government, but by its people. We can be great again, but we the people have to take our country back from our “leaders”.

There are a number of sites out there around this theme. I’m hoping that it catches on, I’m not happy with any of them. I’m voting for anyone running against the incumbent, preferably a libertarian, or someone that will vote for term limits. Hope everyone out there is as fed up with the shenanigans that Congress has been pulling to do the same.
Articles like this really get my blood boiling. I have 5 kids, and I just know one day I’m going to run up against one of these idiotic zero tolerance rules. Zero Tolerance leave no room for understanding the situational details, and you can’t make rules for every possible situation that can come up. I think part of the problem may be that teaching is such a financially unrewarding profession that you get one of two kinds: 1. The dedicated teacher who does it because they love it, and 2: the teacher who does it because they can’t do anything else (there a reason for that saying “those who can, do, those who can’t teach”). The type 2 teacher vastly outnumbers the type 1 teacher, so it would appear they are not trusted to be able to use good judgment when it comes to these zero tolerance rules. I don’t know about you, but I think that they really couldn’t do any worse than the zero tolerance rules are doing.
Obamacare will add an estimated 11 million people to the Medicaid rolls and the legislation only accounts for offsetting the federal share of Medicaid. Under Medicaid, states must provide matching dollars under a federal formula known as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage.The federal share varies from state to state, but averages 57 percent of the total cost of Medicaid. That means that states must pick up, on average, 43 percent of the cost.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that adding 11 million new people to Medicaid will cost federal taxpayers $287 billion over 10 years. That means states will be handed a $216 billion unfunded mandate over that same period. States will either be forced to eliminate other services to pay for this mandated spending, or raise taxes.
Governors were bipartisan in their opposition to requiring the states spend more money on healthcare without providing more dollars. Colorado Governor Bill Ritter Jr. (D) wondered, “There’s a concern about whether they have fully figured out a revenue stream that would cover the costs, and that if they don’t have all the dollars accounted for, it will fall on the states.”
Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour (R), head of the Republican Governors Association said recently, “This huge expansion of Medicaid would be extremely expensive in my state. We anticipate that it would increase spending on Medicaid by 50 percent, and that’s money we don’t have. And other states don’t have it either.”
“As a governor, my concern is that if we try to cost-shift to the states, we’re not going to be in a position to pick up the tab,” said Washington Governor Christine Gregoire (D).
It is easier to make legislation “deficit neutral” when mandating that states spend more money, while providing no way to pay for it. This is hidden spending that will lead to future state and local tax increases.
This is the perfect example of why the 17th amendment (the one making senators elected by popular vote) was a colossal screw-up. If senators were still appointed by the states, the states would still actually have some say in issues like this, as this kind of issue would never go through the senate.
As as current Virginia state senator of the democratic party, I find Sen. Houck’s comments on the current financial situation interesting, especially regarding Creigh Deeds Washington Post article:
Due to the current economic downturn, Governor Tim Kaine initiated his fourth cut since summer 2008 to the Commonwealth’s biennial budget ending June 30, 2010.?? In all, he has cut $7 billion dollars.?? Just like individuals and families, Virginia has made difficult, but necessary, decisions to balance its budget.
Fortunately, Governor Kaine’s proposals contain no tax increases.?? With salaries remaining stagnant or worse individuals losing their jobs, a tax increase is unneeded.? Virginia continues to rank 40th in state and local taxes as a percentage of personal income.
Emphasis is mine.