Archive for August, 2007

Democratic Presidential Debate in Chicago, Illinois - August 4, 2007

Tuesday, August 28th, 2007

Videos, no transcripts.

Video reels from YearlyKos Presidential Forum (by candidate):
Hillary Clinton: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXPEauk2HPU
Mike Gravel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv1akXCUiSQ
John Edwards: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FK-kdnn2Ms
Chris Dodd: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyWFLfkaSkU
Barack Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMvE1s2e8bQ
Dennis Kucinich: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPFEAnGZA5g
Bill Richardson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTI9pB_OsRo

Presidential Forum:
Intro: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ_uALPkdog
Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThCknSNK96Q
Part II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-xy3G1rhJQ
Part III: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dijFRbDDdcw

RichmondLiberty.org: What is a Minor?

Thursday, August 23rd, 2007
RichmondLiberty.org: What is a Minor?
Anyone who says they support laissez-faire or equality must face the issues where there is still inequality, that people consider an exception. The reason a minor overstepping her rights is newsworthy is because every parent sees a potential threat to their own authority. Even minors themselves cooperate with the system at its worst because one day they will have their own ticket to absolute authority, just as grunts in the business world don’t want to end the using, they want to become the users. How many so-called libertarians and social anarchists would be willing to give up their parental authority? It is the closest personal monopoly, a non-issue, a taboo. Hopefully its mention will anger some readers into revealing themselves, stating how young people foolishly leaping into the unknown could suffer the rest of their lives from a rush decision they weren’t ready for, and that everyone would do so at their peril if there was no period of guidance, preparation and supervision. Then I will ask “so if there was a misprint and the girl is 18 instead of 15 her decision suddenly becomes enlightened and acceptable?”. Will the boyfriend awaiting her feel more inclined to be dependable? Will her parents care less and not send her to jail, or will they be locked up themselves for detaining an adult?

I slammed Richmond Liberty a couple of times on their content and questioned whether some of the thoughts posted there truly reflect libertarian values.  I thought I should also post a good article posted there on our societys treatment of “minor children” as something of a form of slave.  Very thought provoking.

RichmondLiberty.org: Company Wants Workers to be Healthy, Silent

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007
RichmondLiberty.org: Company Wants Workers to be Healthy, Silent
The claim that unhealthy people are a financial burden on their healthier neighbors and coworkers because of insurance is an illusion manipulated by those who decide insurance premiums and company policies. A parent can teach their children to share by saying if one child takes two cookies the other gets none, because he holds the cookie jar. It is classic manipulation to draw people’s attention toward each other and away from the decision-makers.

Again, I have to question the “libertarian” bent of this site, if it goes about spewing this kind of drivel, and not even mentioning the fact that govenment forcing employers to provide health insurance for their employees is wrong, government forcing insurance companies to provide everyone with certain benefits, whether they want them or not, is wrong, and goverment forcing individuals to purchase health care insurance is wrong.  Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

Students push for guns on campus

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007
Students push for guns on campus - The Washington Times, America’s Newspaper

College students are pushing for their schools to allow them to carry guns on campus, saying they should have the right to protect themselves in a situation like the one in which 32 Virginia Tech students and faculty were fatally shot.

Andrew Dysart, a George Mason University senior, organized a chapter of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, which hopes to persuade legislators to overturn a Virginia law that allows universities to prohibit students, faculty and staff members with gun permits from carrying their weapons onto campus.

“In a sense, [students] don’t have the same rights to self-defense on campus as the general public,” said Mr. Dysart, who said his four years as a Marine shaped his ideas about self-defense. “It’s really lopsided the way it works.”

Nationwide, 38 states ban weapons at schools, and 16 of those specifically ban guns on college campuses, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Other states allow schools to adopt their own gun policies.

Utah is the only state that specifically allows people to carry concealed weapons at public colleges. Legislation passed in 2004 allows concealed weapons on all state property, including colleges and universities. The University of Utah, which had banned concealed weapons for decades, challenged the law, but the state Supreme Court upheld it last year.

What people don’t seem to understand is that by creating these so-called “safe” zones, what they are really creating are victim or defenseless zones.  Do they honestly think that someone bent on committing a crime is really going to say “whoa, hey, that is a safe zone, I can’t carry a gun in there!”?  No, what they are going to say is “Hey, I don’t want anyone shooting back at me when I go to rob/murder/rape whoever, so let me go to one of these ’safe’ zones where people aren’t allowed to carry weapons.”

Many colleges generally oppose, for safety reasons, allowing concealed-carry permit holders to bring guns onto campus and resist efforts to change the law.

What are the valid safety reasons for not allowing someone who is already able to carry a weapon legally elsewhere in the state not to carry a weapon on campus?  Just because there are students on camps?  Come on, these people are adults, not little kids.

“Obviously, the current policy is ineffective,” he said. “It certainly didn’t protect anyone at Virginia Tech.”

Zoning for land control.

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007
RichmondLiberty.org: “East Ashland” to join fray of supercommunities?
The Ashland Town Council may vote tomorrow on a proposed 101-acre development, which will include 200 homes and a shopping mall. Last month’s public hearing drew 100% public opposition. As always, the choice is between the community and a single developer looking to fill his pocket, all he can offer the council is to write a check. Will every unclaimed piece of ground in Virginia have the same fate? How many developers are out there marking up our state?

I don’t see how this site considers itself to be “libertarian” when it is advocating for government (even local ones are bad) to take control of private property and tell the owner what they can and cannot do with it.  Someone needs to read the Mises article “Zoning is Theft