Health Care for Everyone?
Every uninsured citizen in Massachusetts will soon have affordable health insurance and the costs of health care will be reduced. And we will need no new taxes, no employer mandate and no government takeover to make this happen.
Yes, and candy will rain from the skies, and we will all have a Merry Christmas (whatever your faith). How does one consider laws forcing everyone to purchase private health care coverage (or demonstrate that you can pay for your own medical care) not to be government takeover?
Another 40% of the uninsured were earning enough to buy insurance but had chosen not to do so. Why? Because it is expensive, and because they know that if they become seriously ill, they will get free or subsidized treatment at the hospital. By law, emergency care cannot be withheld. Why pay for something you can get free?
And here we have the root of the problem. Some bleeding heart out there thought it would be a good idea to force hospitals to provide free emergency care for those that “can’t afford it“. Well, why do you think that medical care has gone up in price since then? Because they have to give a lot of it away for free, so the rest of us have to pay more to cover the cost of that. It may sound callous, but why am I forced to pay for someone else’s health care? I have enough responsibility in paying for my own, I don’t need to take on any more people, yet that is what the government is forcing everyone who pays taxes to do. If we were to get rid of the requirements of hospitals to provide free emergency care, costs would come down considerably. If you want to provide health care for those who can’t afford it, go start your own hospital and do so.
Some of my libertarian friends balk at what looks like an individual mandate. But remember, someone has to pay for the health care that must, by law, be provided: Either the individual pays or the taxpayers pay. A free ride on government is not libertarian.
Ahh, here we go. The important issue: why must health care be provided for by law? We don’t make laws that say food must be provided, or water, or heat, or electricity, why health care? Because it is a good entry point for mandating government subsidies for all those things. It makes great PR for the bleeding hearts : “You would deny this child emergency care that they need?” Well, no, probably not, but that is not a decision for the government to make. I have seen countless numbers of families that have put up advertisements in all forms of media asking for money for just these reasons. If you decide not to purchase private insurance, have fun finding the money when something bad happens, but it’s not the governments job to CYA.