Archive for August, 2006

Government Bribery

Tuesday, August 15th, 2006

TimesDispatch.com | Orange council defers vote
Orange council defers vote
It opts to reconsider plans for subdivision in four to six weeks

Richmond Times-Dispatch

Aug 15, 2006

ORANGE — At the developer’s request, the Town Council deferred voting last night on a proposal to build a subdivision that would boost Orange’s population by 40 percent.

[...]

Owens has offered about $12,000 in proffers for each housing unit, or roughly half of the town’s proffer guidelines. Proffers are voluntary payments that developers make to localities to help offset the effect on schools, roads, utilities and public-safety services.

Outside the meeting, Owens referred questions to Frank Cox, the master planner for the project off U.S. 15. Asked if the proffer amounts would increase, Cox would say only that the proffers would be repackaged. He said the size of the development would not change. — Kiran Krishnamurthy

There are those ugly words again, master plan (although this time they are in reference to a master planner). Why does the local government feel the need to regulate this? I’ll tell you why, because it has assumed the responsibility of building schools, roads, utilities, and public-safety services. Were these four items privatized, the town government would no longer care, and that would be a good thing. If there were no market for these homes, the builder wouldn’t be trying to build them. Since there is a market, and since the government controls said items, the developer has to pay proffers (read bribes) to the local officials in order to be allowed to build.

TimesDispatch.com | Powhatan board raises cash proffer
The cost of a new house in Powhatan County just went up.

Without discussion, the Board of Supervisors voted last night to raise the county’s maximum cash proffer to $12,344 per housing lot, a 70.6 percent increase from the previous amount of $7,236.

Cash proffers are payments the county may accept when land is rezoned for new homes to offset the costs of schools, parks and other public facilities.

Proponents say cash proffers make growth pay for itself and relieve pressure on real estate taxes. Critics argue proffers are narrowly applied taxes that drive up costs of new homes.

Powhatan officials blame much of this year’s proffer increase on rising school-construction costs. The county’s cash proffer is based on its estimated cost of schools, libraries, parks, fire stations and public-works facilities. It does not cover road improvements.

More of the same from Powhatan, which has been growing a lot lately.  The same problem, screaming out for the same solution, privatize the schools, roads, utilities, and public-safety services.

Long-awaited Staunton bypass opens

Tuesday, August 15th, 2006

Welcome to News Virginian: Serving the Waynesboro, VA region | Long-awaited Staunton bypass opens
After almost 40 years of planning, hearings, negotiations and construction, the Staunton Loop finally came
full circle Thursday – or rather, half circle.

Hmmm, 40 years.  Amazing.  How long do you think it would have taken a private company, with the prospect of profits from running a toll road, to do the same job?

Bolling boosts rural economics

Tuesday, August 15th, 2006

Welcome to News Virginian: Serving the Waynesboro, VA region | Bolling boosts rural economics
Bolling hopes to put together a legislative agenda on rural needs before the 2007 General Assembly.

One thing he has learned: Schools and employers in rural areas need to work more closely together.

He says there is a disconnect between the skills rural workers have and what the employers in those areas need.

“We need a better integration of schools with the workforce,” he said.

Now, this wouldn’t be a symptom of the government running the school system would it?  If these were privately run schools, you can bet your ass they would be teaching the exact skills that the employers were looking for, otherwise why would people go to them?  I’m surprised that no-one has taken up the initiative to open up a private school doing exactly that, but then again, with the people paying so much in taxes to get their government indoctrination centers, they probably wouldn’t have any money left to pay for the private school tuition.  Now, since it is a government run monopoly, you get schools teaching to the SOL’s, which are probably irrelevant for the area.

Obstacles plague path of 29′s future

Tuesday, August 15th, 2006

DailyProgress.com | Obstacles plague path of 29′s future
In the Places29 Master Plan, officials are planning to redevelop several areas, and they’re linking transportation and land-use planning together in a new way, both to pave the way for future growth and ease the frustration of those who drive it today.

Every time I see “master plan” associated with something government, I cringe.   I’m not sure why government has to get involved in the construction of roads and such, but it does about as good a job at that as it does at everything else.  If they construction of roads were left to private industry, I think we’d see a vast improvement in the way they are constructed and maintained.  A business running a road would have to run it well, or they would go out of business and someone else would take over and run it better.  Government running a road can do it as poorly as possible, and since they are a monopoly, we can’t do anything about it, they just tax us more to cover the “increasing cost.”  I know a lot of people will say that roads are different because they are part of the country (state, county, whatever) infrastructure, but I don’t think so, I think this can be treated as any other private property transaction in a capitalist society.  The person that owns the land can build a road on it.  If you want to use their land and road, you have to come to some agreement with them (i.e. paying a toll) in order to use it.  If the company does a bad job of running their road, you are free to use another one, or to build your own.  I don’t see where government regulation is necessary, I think the free market would manage this quite well enough on its own.

Different localities face same tests

Tuesday, August 15th, 2006

DailyProgress.com | Different localities face same tests
One is a bustling zone, distinguished by a series of car dealerships, shopping centers and office buildings at the center of a growing residential area. Its roads are congested, and its backdrop often includes bulldozers, house frames and the reddish-orange dirt of cleared Central Virginia land.

The other is mostly made up of the quiet, gated Glenmore community, which along with several other neighborhoods is nestled into the rural Keswick landscape. It includes horse stables and lush green hills, and it is defined by the august Glenmore clubhouse.

Both fall along U.S. 250, east of the Charlottesville city limits; both cover fewer than 2,000 acres; and both are growth areas fighting for a master plan ahead of inevitable growth. Pantops and the Village of Rivanna may have patently different landscapes, but they each include a residential base anxious to have a say in what happens around them.

I don’t know why people insist on having a “master plan” for how development is going to take place.  Why doesn’t anyone ever seem to learn that these “master” plans never work?  They are going to end up zoning these areas so that developers can no longer build what they want, and driving up property costs so that people can’t build homes or business.  This will then necessitate government funded housing for those who can’t afford the inflated costs, and so the dependence on government handouts is perpetuated.